Quote by Michael Hiltzik, LA Times
- Action #1: Senators – Replace Ron Bloom and John Barger on the Board of Governors immediately.
- Action #2. Representatives – Congress must enable postal leadership to build the USPS of the future.
- Action #3. Talk to Joe.
“The United States Postal Service shall be operated as a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States, authorized by the Constitution, created by Act of Congress, and supported by the people. “ – 39 U.S. Code § 101(a)
Things are heating up under the USPS pot.
- Seven representatives have submitted H.Con.Res.54 – “Objecting to the slowdown in mail delivery and postage rate increase instituted by Postmaster General Louis DeJoy and seeking to halt both actions pending further investigation.“
- 77 public interest groups sent a letter to President Biden demanding that he NOT reappoint Chair of the USPS Board of Governors Ron Bloom, documenting how his backing of Postmaster General Louis DeJoy implicated him in DeJoy’s failure of leadership, poor performance, and conflicts of interest of both men. (Letter with list of signers here)
- Soon after Postmaster Louis DeJoy began sabotaging the post office, over 300 organizations, including groups like Public Citizen, ACLU, NAACP, Indivisible, MoveOn, Color of Change, the American Postal Workers Union, National Farmers Union, VoteVets, and RuralOrganizing.org – put together a list that will be our marching orders today.
“The Postal Service shall have as its basic function the obligation to provide postal services to bind the Nation together through the personal, educational, literary, and business correspondence of the people.” – 39 U.S. Code § 101(a)
Action #1: Senators – Replace Ron Bloom and John Barger on the Board of Governors immediately.
Minimum script for senators: I’m calling from [zip code] to ask Senator [__] to confirm two diverse and forward-looking members to the postal Board of Governors for the expired seat of Ron Bloom and expiring seat currently held by Republican John Barger (Dec. 8, 2021) immediately to stem the damage that Postmaster General Louis DeJoy is actively wreaking upon the Post Office. I also want the Senator to support the Postal Service Reform Act – S.1720, which eliminates the pre-funding mandate, integrate postal retirees into Medicare, and enable USPS to offer non-postal services.
“It shall provide prompt, reliable, and efficient services to patrons in all areas and shall render postal services to all communities. The costs of establishing and maintaining the Postal Service shall not be apportioned to impair the overall value of such service to the people.“ – 39 U.S. Code § 101(a)
Action #2. Representatives – Congress must enable postal leadership to build the USPS of the future.
(You can call, saying only the BOLDED bits of the list to save time, email the whole thing, or better – BOTH!)
Minimum script for representatives: I’m [calling from [zip code]/writing] to ask Rep. [__] to remove artificial barriers to USPS’s success, and actively enable the postal service to bring in new revenue streams by voting “YES” to the following legislation:
- Postal Service Reform Act – H.R.3076: eliminates the pre-funding mandate, integrate postal retirees into Medicare, and enable USPS to offer non-postal services.
- Postal Service Improvement Act – H.R.3077: implements tracking of all mail-in ballots nationwide and updates the FMLA to require paid parental leave for postal service employees.
- The Access to No-Fee Accounts Act which would grant regular people access to the no-fee high yield bank accounts that the Federal Reserve currently offers only to the commercial banks, and establish a branch network of post offices, community banks, and credit unions to be reimbursed for expenses associated with offering these accounts. One in four American households is unbanked or underbanked, including half of all Black households. This leads to costly alternatives that function as a lifetime tax on accessing your own money.
- Approve language in the FY22 Financial Services & General Government Appropriations Bill that directs the postal service to pilot non-bank financial services in 10 locations, half rural and half urban.
- Provide the $25 billion necessary to make USPS whole from COVID-19. Only $10 billion of which has been approved by Congress.
- Rep. Julia Brownley: email, (CA-26): DC (202) 225-5811, Oxnard (805) 379-1779, T.O. (805) 379-177
- or Rep. Salud Carbajal: email.(CA-24): DC (202) 225-3601, SB (805) 730-1710 SLO (805) 546-8348
- Senator Feinstein: email, DC (202) 224-3841, LA (310) 914-7300, SF (415) 393-0707, SD (619) 231-9712, Fresno (559) 485-7430
- and Senator Padilla: email, DC (202) 224-3553, LA (213) 894-5000, SAC (916) 448-2787, Fresno (559) 497-5109, SF (415) 355-9041, SD (619) 239-3884
- Who is my representative/senator?:https://whoismyrepresentative.com
Action #3. Talk to Joe.
We need you to make a speech about your vision for our Postal Service – to reiterate that this critical infrastructure of democracy is not, nor should it ever be considered a mere “business,” but is, in fact, “a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States, authorized by the Constitution, created by Act of Congress, and supported by the people.”
“It shall provide prompt, reliable, and efficient services to patrons in all areas and shall render postal services to all communities.” It serves every community, no matter how remote or impoverished, and has a long and proud history of employing Black people and serving as a pathway to the Black middle class.
It is living American history whose basic function is to “bind the Nation together through the personal, educational, literary, and business correspondence of the people.” And it did that, until legislators forgot their history, and put cost over value. Over 30,000 post offices act as social hubs, particularly in BIPOC and rural communities. They stand ready to generate new revenue while serving unmet social needs in areas long abandoned by commercial interests, such as postal banking as a safe alternative to predatory payday lenders. Carriers already check in on their route’s seniors. Transmitting that information about their welfare to caregivers could be a life-saving service to our rapidly aging population. Rural broadband, fishing licenses, voter registration, bus and subway passes, census outreach and verification for social security and other benefits would be well within our founding fathers’ vision of binding us together.
Tell us the you are committed to returning our postal system to the world class leader trusted and admired by Americans and a model to the world. Help the Senate find two forward-thinking and diverse govenors to remove and repair the corrosion caused by Postmaster DeJoy. Bring it back, Joe.
Deeper Dive – Privatizing the Post Office is DeJoy’s true mission.
Last year before the presidential election, we began researching the damage the GOP has done to our Postal Service, not just under Trump, but for decades, in order to sell it for parts to their corporate donors. We also reviewed how privatized mail service was going for our European compatriots.
Trump and his gang of lackeys on the USPS Governor’s board used the pandemic to try to finish the USPS off from lack of funds. He’s gone but his unethical Postmaster General Louis DeJoy remains, deliberately slowing down what was once a world class postal service while hiking prices.
- Paul Steidler, senior fellow at the Lexington Institute and an expert on the postal service noted that”mail delivery will be slower than in the 1970s,”calling DeJoy’s plan “disastrous.”When you reduce standards you perpetuate a vicious downward cycle. … It causes people to lose confidence in the mail.”
- Noam Chomsky stated – “That’s the standard technique of privatization: defund, make sure things don’t work, people get angry, you hand it over to private capital.“
Question: If the GOP and Trump want to run the Postal Service like a business, why didn’t they treat it like any other business?
Answer: Because they want to kill it.
Under Trump, the Postal Service suffered crippling losses, just like other businesses during this pandemic. He flatly refused to authorize emergency funding to help them overcome “a $13 billion revenue loss due directly to COVID-19 and a $54.3 billion additional losses over ten years.” Its employees are on the front lines, providing essential services to the rest of us and now 693 of their 630,000 workers have tested positive for COVID-19, more than 6000 are in self-quarantine and several have died. So why won’t the GOP and Trump step up to help them? After all…
- They’re handing $500 billion to other money-losing businesses, including those who’ve abused stock buybacks, those that pay no taxes, and those that have even killed people, like Boeing.
- They don’t force the Pentagon, FBI, CIA, CDC, FDA, FEMA or other agencies to make a profit.
- They don’t force corporations, even government-backed ones like Boeing or Raytheon, to pre-fund their health-care for 75 years! That’s insane.
- They don’t force other businesses to keep doing unprofitable things, like delivering any letter in the US for a flat rate of 55 cents or stop them from adding services their patrons need. (like banking!)
- They’re handing $170 billion tax cut to millionaires and billionaires on the off-chance it might trickle down to a business, and not to an offshore bank.
Our postal system is facing determined predators.
The GOP has wanted to privatize the Postal Service for decades and they are mostly responsible for the yearly headlines that chronicle job slashing, office closing, longer lines and slower or diminished services. OK, so what exactly happened in 2006 with the HR 6407, Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act ?
They dream of selling the USPS off to the highest bidders, (possibly important donors!), in pieces if necessary, and removing the money-losing services like door-to-door deliveries in remote areas. (This video is from 2016, but it sounds like yesterday.)
The winning bidders could then break up the largest union in the US, fire workers, lower wages or just uber-ize them, remove benefits and shift that profit into private investors’ hands. Then they’d raid the USPS’ well-funded retirement account of hundreds of billions of dollars.
The GOP privateers’ dreams are closer to coming true than ever before, having found an ally in our former president, who was willing to veto the entire $2 trillion CARES Act to prevent giving the USPS, the most popular of all public agencies, any financial relief. (He wanted to give tax dollars to foreign-owned cruise lines but the Democrats nixed that.) Why?
Trump was neck-deep in his mail-fraud fantasy and his revenge plot against the Jeff Bezos, owner of both the critical Washington Post and Amazon, which delivers packages to our doorsteps with the help of the USPS. Striking a blow against Amazon may annoy his smarter, richer nemesis, but it could kill our postal system and our accessible elections. But the one thing our loser of an ex-president is good at is killing businesses.
Republicans should fight very hard when it comes to state wide mail-in voting. Democrats are clamoring for it. Tremendous potential for voter fraud, and for whatever reason, doesn’t work out well for Republicans. @foxandfriends— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 8, 2020
A tale of two reports
In preparation for destroying our most beloved public agency, the Trump White House created two documents.
- SELL IT!: The first was a June 2018 OMB report – “Delivering Government Solutions in the 21st Century” which frankly detailed the steps to make the USPS attractive for sale to private investors, fattening it up by raising prices and cutting wages and benefits. However, someone in Trump’s orbit must have remembered that many GOP voters live in rural areas whose postal access has already been hard hit by their own party’s shenanigans. So the approach was softened to this…
- GET IT READY FOR SALE: In December of 2018, “United States Postal Service: A Sustainable Path Forward,” a report for a task force headed by Treasure Secretary Steven Mnuchin, produced the soft-porn version of the OMB’s report, cloaking its recommendations to prepare the USPS for takeover without specifically endorsing privatization, while wasting three pages mooning over foreign privately-owned models. (pages 29-31). No surprises – the report includes eliminating collective bargaining and forbidding a repeat of the last century’s success with banking services, due to the historical power of payday lender lobbyists.
Though the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) supported some of the report’s recommendations – such as maintaining the geographic scope of the Universal Service Obligation (USO), reducing the burden of the prefunding mandate and exploring the addition of new services outside the current USO to help fund the agency, they felt overall it had “fundamentally misdiagnoses the operational and financial condition of the Postal Service, and as a result offered recommendations that would seriously weaken if not destroy USPS, a national treasure and vital part of our nation’s economic infrastructure.”
The NALC state that the report “would dramatically raise mailing costs for “commercial mailers” and shippers, slash the frequency and quality of delivery, and gut the standard of living of postal employees by outsourcing their jobs, stripping them of collective bargaining rights and reducing their retirement and workers’ compensation benefits. These recommendations would weaken, not strengthen the Postal Service – and threaten the most efficient and affordable universal postal system in the world.” So, not good. The entire analysis by the NALC is here.
The United States has privatized what should be public resources before. As usual, it hurts rural communities and the poor and middle classes, while enriching the original investors.
However, the intent of our postal service laws are pretty clear.
“It shall provide prompt, reliable, and efficient services to patrons in all areas and shall render postal services to all communities. The costs of establishing and maintaining the Postal Service shall not be apportioned to impair the overall value of such service to the people. The Postal Service shall provide a maximum degree of effective and regular postal services to rural areas, communities, and small towns where post offices are not self-sustaining. No small post office shall be closed solely for operating at a deficit, it being the specific intent of the Congressthat effective postal services be insured to residents of both urban and rural communities.” – 39 U.S. Code § 101(a)
Privatizing the Postal Service would turn this on its head, as described by economist Rick Geddes in his mean-spirited 2004 manifesto. (Blue titles are ours!).
- Pay your own way!: First, basic economics implies that rural customers are unlikely to be without service under competition; they would simply have to pay the true cost of delivery to them, which may or may not be lower than under monopoly. (The 328 million Americans who rely on the mail foressential services, including prescription drugs will be very interested to hear this. – Private services like FedEx, add a “Delivery Area Surcharge” to harder-to-reach zip codes.)
- You chose to live there!: Second, basic notions of fairness imply that the cross-subsidy should be eliminated. To the extent that people make choices about where they live, they should assume the costs of that decision. (It delivers about 1 million lifesaving medications each year and serves as the only delivery link to Americans living in rural areas.)
- Cutthroat competition is always better!: Third, there is no reason why the government monopoly is necessary to ensure service to sparsely populated areas. The government could easily award competitive contracts to private firms for that service.
- Buy computers, you losers!: Fourth, early concerns that rural residents of the United States would somehow become isolated without federally subsidized mail delivery today are simply unfounded. … Once both sender and receiver have access to a computer, the marginal cost of sending an electronic message is close to zero. (This is untrue for 42 million Americans without access to broadband access due to location. It is unknown how many simply can’t afford it. Also, it’s still very hard to send objects by email.)
What else could be be lost with privatization…
- The GOP, and their law enforcement associates, including ICE, may also want easier access to your private communications.
- “The US mail comes equipped with legal protection.“Law enforcement can’t open your mail without a judge’s say-so, and any private individual who tries could face a long sojourn as an involuntary guest of the feds.”
- “Laws governing the sanctity of your email are in their infancy. Actually, that’s a gross overstatement: They’re positively fetal. Government agencies may not need any warrant at all to read some of your emails. Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and anyone else whose system carries your email can read your messages at whim, with no consequences.” (LA Times)
- On the other hand, the GOP wants nothing to do with two functions the USPS’ “Universal Service Obligation” facilitates – the constitutional requirement of the Census and fair and accessible vote-by-mail elections.
Privatizing, just like dear old Europe.
Both White House’s reports referenced the privatization of post offices in foreign countries. One states – “Like many European nations, the United States could privatize its postal operator.” Mnuchin singled out two countries for their privatization efforts – Germany and New Zealand.
Our first thought was “What!?! Our government wants to do something the Europeans do? How about focusing on something else they do, like nationalizing health care?”
Our next thought was – How is that privatizing working out for them? What Mnuchin didn’t reveal is that European nations charge substantially more for mail services delivered in a much smaller area, and they regularly raise the price of delivery. One example is that the price of sending a letter in the United Kingdom has increased 80 percent over the last decade.
UK Royal Mail – “…one giant-sized con from beginning to end“
This video is from 2017.
In 2013, the Royal Mail, a 500-year old system, was privatized. “Part of the justification for this was that people’s habits were changing.” While there was a 40% drop in mail, the privatizers failed to mention the increase in packages. “…This has been by far the greatest shift in the industry since the onset of the digital revolution: the sheer number of packets we carry, a much more profitable enterprise. I can’t believe the government hadn’t predicted this when they decided to sell off the Royal Mail, or that experts in the industry weren’t already aware of it. In other words, it’s been one giant-sized con from beginning to end.” (The anti-private mail folks included this nice list of why privatizing is bad for non-millionaires.)
So what do other Europeans think?
Europe reports: Accoring to Global Research: “After fifteen years of market-opening, the balance sheet of post “liberalization” is overwhelmingly negative…In sum, post liberalization has not improved services and reduced prices as promised by the European Commission and others. Instead, liberalization has produced a few winners and many losers.(Note: “Economic liberalization refers to the reduction or elimination of government regulations or restrictions on private business and trade. It is usually promoted by advocates of free markets and free trade… Economic liberalization also often involves reductions of taxes, social security, and unemployment benefits. (It) is often associated with privatization, which is the process of transferring ownership or outsourcing of a business, enterprise, agency, public service or public property from the public sector to the private sector.”)
The winners are private shareholders of former public monopolies, post managers and large customers.
The losers include private households, especially those in rural areas, and postal sector workers who have experienced liberalization as massive deterioration of employment and working conditions…The European postal service privatization process has been, however, very successful in reducing labour costs and in turning what used to be a reservoir of stable and decent jobs, especially for low-skilled workers, into an area of precarious and low-waged work.”
- With few exceptions, the new competitors emerging from privatization never opened post offices or installed letter boxes. Instead they pick-up mail directly at the premises of their mostly large corporate customers.
- Mail delivery has typically been reduced to only two or three days a week and only in highly populated areas.
- Prices have decreased for large customers such as banks, telephone companies and online retailers because they can negotiate individual price rebates.
- Standard mail costs have increased in a number of countries.
- Corporate issues like bankruptcy still occur – i.e. 2008 insolvency of the main competitor in Germany and the recent takeover of a major competitor in the Netherlands.
- Privatization is responsible for cuts between 20-50% in employment numbers, an increase in atypical and precarious forms of employment, a reduction in wages, as well as an intensification of work and a fragmentation of industrial relations. Here’s a employment horror story from the “Dutch Model.”
- Contrary to the European Commission’s prediction, these job cuts were not offset by the resulting growth in employment among new market entrants and most new jobs created were part-time.
- In Germany, less than 20% of the workforce at the new competitors is employed on full-time contracts. Almost 25% work normal part-time, whereas a majority of almost 60 % work very short part-time, or what in Germany is called ‘mini jobs’ (jobs that pay less than €400 per month).
- Wages have been substantially reduced, often below minimum standards.
- In a German study, piece rates of between 70 and 90 cents per delivered item amount to an average hourly wage of €5.
- Self-employed deliverers in the parcel and express services partly compensate for low hourly wages by putting in extremely long working hours.
So what about New Zealand?:
Per Mnuchin’s task force reported – “For example, in New Zealand, which has a fully privatized postal system, the operator has a “Deed of Understanding” with the government, ensuring the provision of the USO (Universal Service Obligation).”
The 1989 Deed required New Zealand Post to provide 6-day a week service, along with other requirements:
- provide six days a week delivery to more than 90% of delivery points and five day a week delivery to more than 99% of delivery points
- not increase the proportion of counter delivery services or community mail boxes beyond 0.85% of all delivery points;
- maintain at least 1,202,073 delivery points;
- maintain a uniform basic letter price at 40c, with certain changes allowed in line with changes in the Consumer Price Index; and
- maintain a network of at least 880 official‘ (i.e. staffed by New Zealand Post personnel) and agency‘ (i.e. not owned and operated by New Zealand Post) post offices and postal delivery centres, including at least 330 official post offices.
However, the NZPost’s core business was “cherry picked” by private mail companies not obliged under the Postal Services Act to provide a nationwide mail service. Therefore, the NZPost is required to carry DX Mail’s ‘reject’ unprofitable mail, and the country’s taxpayers are subsidising a private mail company which is privatising the core business of a state owned enterprise. “NZPost employees may be the only workers in New Zealand compelled by law to actively assist a competitor in putting themselves out of a job.”
In 2013, NZPost renegotiated it’s mandate and in 2015, mail delivery was reduced – each street address in major towns and cities would receive standard mail delivery either on Monday, Wednesday and Friday or on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. The new contract:
- provide a minimum basic postal service for delivery of letters which includes not less than three day per week delivery to 99.88 % of delivery points within New Zealand Post‘s network;
- include within its network a minimum of 1,910,010 delivery points (being the number of delivery points in the network as at 30 June 2012);
- not reduce the frequency of delivery under the basic postal service to those areas where New Zealand Post offered a three or two day delivery service as at 30 June 2012;
- increase the number of delivery points within its network if and to the extent there is demand for it to do so, but this undertaking will be subject to New Zealand Post‘s reasonable opinion about what is commerciallysustainable and operationally practicable; and
- maintain a network throughout the country where consumers can purchase postal services. The network will contain no fewer than 880 service points in total, including no fewer than 240 where consumers can, in addition to purchasing postal services, use such bill payment services as New Zealand Post may provide from time to time. The network may be made up of a combination of outlets owned by New Zealand Post, services hosted in other businesses and electronic self-service kiosks
Job losses included 1500 to 2000 frontline and back-office jobs.
Allow our USPS to thrive!
Add banking again:
From 1911 to 1967, (prime MAGA fantasy-time!) , the US Post Office did act as a bank, accepting deposits and paying interest for small accounts. Today’s post office already offers simple financial services like money orders and international money transfers.
“Literally the only person who is going to be against this is somebody who wants to protect payday lender profits.” – Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)
- Re-up this legislation: In 2018, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) introduced legislation that would have required every U.S. post office to provide basic banking services. This bill, if passed, would have improved the lives of more than one-quarter of Americans households (34 million homes, 80 million people), who are either “unbanked” ― meaning they lack someone with a bank account altogether ― or “underbanked” ― relying on payday loans or other so-called alternative lenders to supplement the services of a traditional bank.
- Racism is part of this: Because of racial wealth and income gaps of black and Latino households, they are more likely to be both unbanked and underbanked. The unbanked rate among black households is 18.2 percent, compared with 7 percent for the population as a whole.
- Physical access to bank branches remains important but banks are fleeing low-income areas. Nationally, banks have shut 1,915 more branches in lower-income neighborhoods than they’ve opened in the four years through 2018, according to S&P Global Inc. However, the postal system’s 30,000 locations touch every community. A majority ― 59 percent ― are in “banking deserts”, or zip codes that have either no bank branches or just one. Yes, there is online banking, but according to a 2017 government study, “…some groups with higher unbanked and underbanked rates, including lower-income households, less-educated households, older households, and households in rural areas, continue to disproportionately use bank tellers as their primary—and often only—method for accessing their accounts.“
- It’s expensive to be poor – A payday loan of $375 typically costs a borrower an additional $520 in interest and triple-digit fees, according to Pew Charitable Trusts. The average underbanked household has an annual income of $25,500, and spends nearly 10 percent on alternative financial products and associated fees, according to a 2011 KPMG study. “There is a huge racial justice issue,” Gillibrand said. “The average person who gets a payday loan is a 44-year-old African American single mom. It overwhelmingly affects communities of color.”
The USPS has a that network of 32,000 retail outlets (many of them historic and even works of art) that form the most extensive local presence of any business or government in America, drawing more than seven million people into them each day.
An experienced, smart, skilled, and dedicated workforce of nearly 600,000 middle-class Americans who live in the communities they serve and are brimming with ideas and energy to move the Postal Service forward — if only those at the top would listen and turn them loose
The general goodwill of the public, which sees the local post office and its employees as “theirs,” providing useful services and standing as one of their core civic institutions (in a 2009 Gallup Poll, 95 percent of Americans said it was personally important to them that the Postal Service be continued).
Go digital!: John Nichols reported in The Nation that USPS already has the world’s third-largest computer infrastructure, including 5,000 remote locations with satellite Internet service. Rather than bemoan the loss of postal business to the Internet, become an Internet hot spot in town after town for universal email, digital scanning, and forwarding of documents, etc.
- Expand that into a handy consumer service offering high-speed broadband all across the country.
- In Sweden, the Post Office will physically deliver e- mail correspondence to people who are not online.
- In Switzerland, registered users can have their physical mail received, scanned, and delivered into their email boxes
- In Germany, Duetsche Post will allow customers to communicate through secure servers
Expand the store: Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders wants to let post offices sell products and services that they’re now barred from offering (thanks to corporate opposition and Congressional meddling). Sanders suggests allowing sales of cellphones, delivery of wine, selling fishing licenses, notarizing documents, etc. This would be a boon to the people in poor neighborhoods and rural areas who don’t have convenient access to such services.
Expand, not shrink access: Instead of reducing service, be the only entity that offers reliable delivery service to every community in the country, seven days a week.
Sen. Bernie Sander’s Postal Service Protection Act proposed creating a blue ribbon commission composed of entrepreneurs, representatives of labor and small businesses to provide recommendations on how the postal service can generate new revenue to succeed in the 21st century.