STATE: Governor – 2026 Primary Election

Note: This post is “IN PROCESS” and will be periodically updated! (05/18/26)

Governor – Vote for (1)

Video from Indivisible El Dorado and friends

If you missed the debate, here it is.

Link: (https://youtu.be/qRNZ0kuA49k?si=Wr5Dk5tFW50uS6Ht)

Indivisible groups put together this comparison chart on top three candidates here

Back to top

Greenpeace scores – read their analysis here.

A note from fellow activist after watching the debate.

GROUPS THAT COULDN’T MAKE UP THEIR MINDS!

CADEM

ENDORSED Tom Steyer (D) – Climate Advocate

Back to top

RECOMENDATION: YES! (Cue the wailing and gnashing of teeth!) Here are the reasons why we’re endorsing Mr. Steyer:

  • THE ENEMY OF MY ENEMY: That PG&E still exists after 90 felonies related to safety lapses, including 84 counts of involuntary manslaughter for the 2018 Camp Fire, the massive pipeline explosion in the Hayward area that destroyed homes and hospitalized residents ,and their refusal to pay taxes on Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant (See the “Board of Equalization” page about this), absolutely enrages us. Newsom whiffed his opportunity to take them apart.
    • PG&E has already scoped him as their mortal enemy, and has aimed a $10 million campaign to sink him in the polls.
    • Becerra, the closest competitor in recent polls, has taken Chevron donations for his campaign and has ZERO environmental endorsements.
  • THE LIMITS OF IDENTITY POLITICS: We also based our decision on feedback from Latino members of CA indivisibles. Identity politics automatically giving Chevron-friendly politicos like Becerra the edge is how their community will continue to get screwed. “How can someone of my own [pick one: ethnic, racial, religious, etc.] group cheat me?.” Because it’s easy – the “danger” warning system in your brain is lulled to sleep. (See: Bernie Madoff, Donald Trump) They spoke persuasively that the candidate most committed to smacking equity and fossil fuel interests is the one best suited for the job of protecting minority populations who live in sacrifice neighborhoods and those who work in outside jobs.
  • SINS OF THE PAST: Can we forgive? This is a serious question. Some religions demand it and our society encourages second chances for the formerly incarcerated. For those in the “never forgive, never forget” camp over Steyer’s business history, exhibit one would be Oskar Schindler. Now considered a hero, he was a Nazi party member who ended up using the slave-labor aspect of his business to save the lives of over 1200 people. Like the ghost of Scrooge’s old partner, Marley, we carry psychic chains of past hurt, anger, hubris, and ego. The question is whether or not we can remove the ones that no longer serve us or others.
  • LISTENING TO OUR FRIENDS:
    • CA-DSA (Democratic Socialists) have deemed him the most progressive candidate, as has Bernie’s group – Our Revolution. But what topped it off for us was the most reluctant endorsement we’ve ever read, from the progressive group KNOCK-LA (we posted it below his endorsement grid.)
    • Also, what Amy says in the instagram video below. And Bill McKibben below that. And Rebecca Solnit.
  • BILLIONAIRES’ BALL: Can’t swing a cat without hitting one in this race, including those funding Becerra and other candidates as well. This is our current reality. Until we can restructure wealth taxes, we think having one pull the cart for us is infinitely better that one whipping us from the driver’s seat, using a friendly politico as a beard.
  • ROBERT REICH HAS JUST WEIGHED IN: https://robertreich.substack.com/p/tom-steyer-for-governor-of-california?utm_id=97758_v0_s00_e232_tv2_tp1_a1demonlfteheg

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GlQwTlgFF4)

(https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYF6TNpS-Ti/)

  • Age: 68
  • City of residence: San Francisco
  • Occupation: (wiki) Businessman, philanthropist and environmentalist, founder of Farallon Capital,NextGen America, a progressive political action committee, and Galvanize Climate Solutions, a climate change-centered investment firm.
  • Education: Yale (BA), Stanford University (MBA)
  • Funding: self-funded
  • Endorsements: https://www.tomsteyer.com/endorsements
  • Website: https://www.tomsteyer.com/issues

Founded by Bernie Sanders
sierra clubsierra club
PAC
BETTY YEE
Former
Henry Stern
Dr. LaShae Sharp-Collins

Former
Tasha Boerner
Dr. Corey JacksonAss Nick Schultz

https://robertreich.substack.com/p/tom-steyer-for-governor-of-california?utm_id=97758_v0_s00_e232_tv2_tp1_a1demonlfteheg
CA Teachers association
Santa Barbara Independent

WHAT HAS HE DONE?

  • (2007) Co-founded the Beneficial State Bank, a community development bank dedicated to economic justice and environmental sustainability. As of 2024, Beneficial State Bank is a $1.9 billion asset state-chartered, federally insured bank with branches in California, Oregon, and Washington. There are currently four locations in CA: Los Angeles, Oakland, Porterville and Fresno.
  • (2010) Defeating Proposition 23 – Tom co-chaired the successful campaign to stop oil companies from rolling back California’sclimate laws, helping protect and grow the state’s clean energy economy and hundreds of thousands of jobs.
  • (2010) Tom Steyer and his wife, Kat Taylor, signed The Giving Pledge in August 2010. They were among the first group of wealthy individuals to commit to donating the majority of their wealth to philanthropic causes through the campaign created by Bill Gates and Warren Buffett. 
  • (2013) Tom co-founded and invested $20 million into the “For Our Future” PAC as well as NextGen America to build long-term organizing infrastructure.  NextGen America has became the largest youth voter engagement organization in U.S. history.
  • (2012) – Proposition 39 – Tom co-led and funded this measure, which closed corporate tax loopholes and has generated billions for California schools, specifically funding energy efficiency upgrades and creating thousands of union jobs.
  • (2016) – Proposition 56 – Tom served as co-chair and major funder of this tobacco tax initiative, which now delivers over $1 billion annually for healthcare, particularly supporting Medi-Cal and public health programs.
  • (2017) Became a major Democratic donor against Donald Trump, launching the “Need to Impeach” movement. He also ran as a Democratic candidate for U.S. President in the 2020 election.
  • (2026) He supports the proposed California wealth tax. He is the only major gubernatorial candidate to support the one-time (5%) levy on billionaire wealth, even stating he would vote for it if it reaches the November ballot. 

(Santa Barbara Independent) We are endorsing Tom Steyer for governor not because he’s perfect but because he has articulated the clearest understanding of California’s housing affordability crisis, why it exists, and the most cogent plan for responding to it. Whether a billionaire with no experience in elected office has the chops necessary to pull this off is, of course, open to doubt. But we are struck by his energy, his creativity, and the audacity — and, yes, perhaps arrogance — of his moral imagination. We are also struck by the existential urgency with which he has thrown himself into the fight to arrest climate change. We are in a now-or-never moment, and he has been expressing this in word, deed, and treasure for many years. We have been impressed by former Congressmember Katie Porter and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, but we found their solutions not as on the mark as Steyer’s. We recognize that Xavier Becerra is the frontrunner, and we wish we could have been more impressed by his track record and current understanding central to California’s problems. He was Secretary of Health and Human Services in the midst of the COVID crisis but took a weak leadership role, leaving that to Doctor Anthony Fauci. This gives us doubt about his executive ability and vision at a time when California desperately needs both. We struggled to achieve a sense of clarity on this endorsement longer than ever in our 40-year history. We explain more of our reasoning here.

(Progressive Voter Guide) Progressive endorsements: Tom Steyer has the endorsement of many groups in the state, including Courage California, NRDC Action Fund, California Environmental Voters, California Teachers Association, United Domestic Workers, California Nurses Association, and several other labor groups. He is also supported by Rep. Ro Khanna and several state legislators, such as Legislative Progressive Caucus Chair Asm. Alex Lee, Asm. Isaac Bryan, Asm. Mia Bonta, Sen. Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, and Sen. Caroline Menjivar. 

Top issues: Affordability, single-payer health care, education, corporate accountability and taxation, housing development, climate protections, and revenue generation

Governance and community leadership experience: Steyer founded the hedge fund management firm Farallon Capital Management before leaving that role in 2012 to dedicate himself to full-time policy advocacy. As a philanthropist, he was an early adopter of the Giving Pledge, making a public commitment to donate most of his wealth during his lifetime. To that end, he has been a longtime investor in grassroots organizing, advocating for Donald Trump’s impeachment during his first term, founding NextGen to support youth voter registration across the country, advocating for the passage of several state propositions on criminal-justice reform and progressive taxation, founding a nonprofit bank to provide affordable loans and reinvestment to local communities, and helping to establish free, nutritious school lunches for public school students in California. 

His campaign has advocated for shifting the property tax burden through the passage of a split-roll ballot measure, improving access to MediCal and single-payer health care, increasing the state’s education ranking, and building one million homes that are affordable for everyday Californians. He has been outspoken about the criminality of federal immigration action, the Abolish ICE movement, and the importance of ensuring that California does not cooperate with illegal enforcement. Steyer has also been active in climate justice, supporting emissions-reduction efforts and holding polluters accountable for the harm they cause to local communities. He has advocated for reducing the cost of electricity to make green energy affordable to the average resident through electric vehicles, residential heat pumps, and solar panels. 

Other background: Steyer has lived in San Francisco for 40 years. 

(abc7) Steyer is a billionaire who wants billionaires to pay their fair share. He said California would not lose its competitive edge even if billionaires leave to shield their private wealth. He also addressed a proposed one-time 5% wealth tax that has not yet made the ballot.

“In theory, I support it, and I’m going to wait and see what happens before I decide specifically if there is a wealth tax on the ballot,” he said.

Steyer also wants a special election to rewrite Proposition 13’s tax limits for commercial properties.

“Large businesses that own huge office buildings and huge malls have been getting a tax loophole for over 40 years that makes no sense,” Steyer said.

(CA-DSA) “There are myriad left-wing protest votes one could take (none of which are going to come close to winning), the most prominent of which are Ramsey Robinson and Butch Ware. We highly encourage voters to not cast a protest vote, as the stakes are incredibly high and the chance of the top two candidates both being Republicans is still very real. We especially urge you to not write-in Butch Ware, who failed to qualify for the ballot and has lashed out against Californian Left, including the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), Peace and Freedom Party (PFP), and DSA. Aside from his previous anti-abortion and transphobic statements, the latter of which he has doubled down on during his run for governor, he also saw it fit to call Shirley Weber, a Black woman, Gavin Newsom’s “house slave” in an ill-executed diss track.”

However, the most progressive of the current viable candidates for governor is Tom Steyer. Time will tell whether he’s truly a class traitor.

(Streets for All) We are endorsing Steyer because his stated policy values and campaign focus are most clearly aligned with Streets For All’s vision for the future of California: more efficient, affordable, and climate-friendly transportation choices, abundant and affordable housing, and cities designed to minimize car-dependency.

Steyer sees California’s challenges as the product of captured systems, bad incentives, and powerful incumbents, not as inevitable facts of life. He and his organizations appear more willing than others to name the forces blocking transformational change on transportation, housing, and infrastructure: oil companies, utilities, corporate tax beneficiaries, freeway interests, and regulatory systems that make good projects too hard and bad projects too easy. 

On transportation, the strongest signal of Steyer’s record is NextGen Policy, the organization he founded and funded. NextGen has become one of California’s most important anti-highway expansion, pro-transit, pro-sustainable-transportation voices. Its work directly challenges freeway-centric transportation planning, argues that EVs alone will not solve our climate emissions from transportation, and calls for shifting money away from destructive highway expansions and towards transit and active mobility. NextGen Policy and Streets For All have been close partners for years in fights against highway expansion and for better transit.

On housing and climate, Steyer proposes building one million homes over four years, making housing “cheaper, faster, and better,” streamlining permitting, reforming zoning, enforcing state housing laws, and building dense housing near public transit. His support for SB 79 (Wiener) on transit-oriented development is meaningful; he seems to understand that housing, transportation, and climate are one connected problem, not three separate issues. Steyer has also vocally supported an effort to reform Proposition 13, and climate. His platform is not generic environmentalism; he wants to make polluters pay, defend CARB and California’s climate laws, lower electricity costs, expand clean technology, and treat decarbonization as a cost-of-living strategy. 

Bottom line: Steyer is an outsider who appears willing to challenge the transportation status quo by tackling the highway lobby and fossil-fuel industry. He has a strong climate record and his takes on housing and transportation align with Streets For All’s values and policy goals.

(knock-la.com) The California governor’s race could be generously described as a goat rodeo. The state Democratic Party is directionless, and Governor Newsom is primarily concerned with anti-Trump memes and impressing his chud son by interviewing internet bigots on his podcast. Maybe it’s for the best, though — if he’s busy online he can’t destroy unhoused people’s possessions for a photo op. In the meantime, an endless parade of candidates have somehow put us in danger of a Republican vs. Republican runoff: MAGA dipshit Steve Hilton and Literal Fascist / Ambulatory Moustache Chad Bianco crawling over the finish line with 15% each.

  • If you’re familiar with past guides, you know we’ve been more than happy to say “don’t vote for either of these creeps.” Not every race has a candidate who deserves your vote. But sometimes we as voters have to play a numbers game.
  • After many long conversations, we’ve come to the conclusion that you should vote for Tom Steyer. A literal billionaire. I think I’m going to vomit.
  • One of the inescapable issues of running for statewide office in California is that you’re running for statewide office in California, with nearly 40 million people across a vast geographic range. As the race has progressed, the realistic field of candidates has narrowed.
  • Swalwell was a favorite of the moneyed establishment until long-rumored accusations of sexual assault finally surfaced and his supporters immediately dumped him — perhaps relieved that the other shoe they’d been on the lookout for finally dropped. The big bucks have pivoted to Becerra, who after months of silence finally found the resources to bombard us with text messages.
  • Becerra isn’t it. In the simplest sense, a person who can’t say “Abolish ICE” is completely unfit to represent California. We in LA have borne the brunt of the federal Gestapo assault on our neighbors and if you can’t stand with us, you can go to hell. That’s not his only failing, however — he’s accepted a maximum donation from Chevron and consistently sides with the oil industry including supporting new drilling and oil production in California. He turned his back on single-payer healthcare to earn the backing of a health industry lobby. Becerra is only clay in the hands of wealthy corporations.
  • Katie Porter was definitely screwed over in 2024, when Adam Schiff (D-Raytheon) boosted Republican Steve Garvey in order to box her out of the runoff. But that doesn’t make her a good candidate for governor. No one we talked to had a positive experience with her office during her time in Congress. Porter has also come out against the proposed Billionaire Tax, a small tax on people whose wealth is so great as to warp the world around them; unilaterally disarming in the class war puts her at odds with the working people of California.
  • So it’s Steyer then, as disgusted as we might feel about another oligarch governor. His commitment to environmentalism is genuine, he supports single-payer healthcare, he backs the billionaire tax, he’s unafraid to say that ICE should be abolished and that they should be prosecuted under state law for their crimes. It’s a strange position to find ourselves in, but remember: an elected official is a battlefield, not a general. We don’t count on elected leaders to simply take care of us out of the goodness of their souls — we have to engage with them, push them, and challenge them, even the ones we support, to accomplish our goals.
  • While we cast those ballots, however, we should also ask why the governor’s race looks the way it does. Why are candidates backed by Democratic Party power players unwilling to call for the elimination of Trump’s fascist stormtroopers? Why are candidates still willing to call for more oil drilling, against the will of the voters, in a state that has seen the devastating effects of climate change firsthand? Why are our state politics, in a state with democratic supermajorities all up and down the line, still so captured by the wealth and influence of right-wing interests?
  • At this point, it’s clear: if we want to keep MAGA out of the Governor’s mansion, Steyer is the best choice. And of course, he has the all-important Juvenile endorsement.

Because we love Rebecca Solnit, we saved this column, and are printing it in full.

Wrote a thing you can read here in full or at my newsletter (link at bottom) or not read:

  • Before I get into my main topic I want to issue a warning about the popular strategy for this governor’s race: the wait and vote for whichever Democrat is ahead to prevent two Republicans making it into the November election. There are unreliable polls out there trying to get you to support their candidate, and this vote-for-the-top-Democrat position makes these polls dangerous this time around. PG&E has reportedly produced a poll that suggests Becerra is ahead, which mostly tells us that PG&E thinks it would do well under a Becerra administration while it is also spending $10 million on anti-Steyer ads because Steyer has bold climate and electricity-price plans that interfere with the utility’s power and profit margin. There will be trustworthy polls; there will apparently also be propaganda disguised as polls. Be careful about where you get your information (which is the main warning for the 21st century anyway).
  • But also beware: if you want to vote near or on the June 2 election day, you must do so in person, by delivering your ballot to a polling place, voting in person, or delivering your ballot to an election official/office/box. Votes by mail must go in a week or more before June 2.
  • I meant my essay about Tom Steyer to be a one-and-done but I keep running across people saying the same thing about him, and it is a thing that doesn’t actually make sense. It’s the illogic that provokes me to respond more than the defense of Steyer’s record (but they’re kind of the same thing in this case). People keep saying: “he doesn’t have the experience,” the premise apparently being having held elected office of any kind is uniquely qualifying and there is no substitute for it. This is nonsense. There are lots of ways to become expert in how government works besides being an elected official. Too, the job of legislating is a very different job than governing, and experience in the former is not necessarily qualification for the latter. A legislator oversees a staff of perhaps a dozen; a governor of California hundreds of thousands.
  • How the state government works is not a mystery; it is not run by a secret priesthood whose initiates shut out all others from the sacred rites. A whole lot of unelected people are not just involved but expert in how legislation gets passed, and how the state administers its programs. Around the actual elected officials are thousands of people – staffers, lawyers, campaigners, and organizers (and, alas, lobbyists) trying to usher a piece of legislation through the process or prevent it from passing. State employees turn successful measures into policy. Journalists who build careers around reporting on the process, the politics, and the players are crucial for keeping the rest of us informed and holding politicians accountable. A lot of these people become as expert as any elected official (or more so in specialized areas); a lot of legislators rely on their expertise.
  • Steyer has worked for sixteen years to pass legislation in California, which adds up to significant experience in the system, and some success with it. In the piece I wrote, I quoted former State Senator Nancy Skinner: “Even though Tom has never held elected office, he has been actively involved in state issues for decades. He established Next Gen California to be his policy think tank and advocacy group in Sacramento. NextGen and Tom were at my side for some of my most important progressive victories.”
  • A governor should understand how state government works; a governor should also know how to govern, aka be able to manage a large administration. It’s amusing to me that the people who insist that Steyer must have experience most probably said nothing of the sort about Zohran Mamdani when he was running for mayor of New York. Being in the New York state assembly 2020 to 2025 was not the same thing as heading an administration with (as of late 2024) 306,248 employees serving a city of eight million. No legislator, even a senate majority leader, heads anything remotely like that – and yet Mamdani seems to be doing great.
  • I think there’s a sweet spot between being totally new to the work and being so familiar with it you’re just entrenched in the status quo and not ready to do anything differently, maybe can’t even see that things can be done differently and should be. (Think of how Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein scoffed at the Sunrise Movement advocates pushing for the Green New Deal in 2018 – they sneered, but the GND became the seed that grew into the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, thanks to more visionary leadership.) The main reason I’ve advocated for Steyer is: he’s a bold climate champion who understands that we are in an emergency and what we – and the governor of this powerful state – can do about it. Can and should.
  • For decades most politicians who are not outright climate deniers have sounded like “oh yes, as you mention, the building is on fire and countless beings are trapped in it, and what if in a week or so I wander over and splash a little leftover lemonade on it?” We need something different as in better. Speaking of qualifications, Steyer is the only climate champion in the race (he even wrote a book about climate solutions). Speaking of climate, you can read Bill McKibben on Xavier Becerra’s climate record here; spoiler: not good. Steyer was endorsed by Our Revolution, California DSA (see below), and a lot of progressive legislators, from California state assembly to Senator Whitehouse because he is progressive across the board on economic justice, housing, and other issues (and apparently because these legislators think he can govern).
  • But back to governance: Steyer has been at the top of a big organization, his investment company. He left it in 2012 as his values and focus were shifting. He wrote to his investors, “Now it’s time to focus full-time on giving back. I want my life to revolve around service in one form or another, including continuing participation in our community bank, in encouraging the advanced energy economy and in specific public policy initiatives here in California.” He did those things. They included donating what, so far as I can tell, amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars, and founding a number of other organizations, in this case nonprofits and other entities to pursue climate, democracy, economic justice, and other issues and to get deeply and successfully involved in the California legislative process.
  • You don’t have to like him, and I get it: he’s a dorky old white guy with bad ties and too much money (even though he’s given a lot of it away). But the argument he’s not qualified seems muddled about what constitute qualifications. And here I should say I absolutely adore Mamdani and wish that I got to vote for someone like that in this race (as I said in my earlier essay, I had hoped Rob Bonta would run), but you work with the options that exist, not the ones you wish existed. Meanwhile the amount of money that corporate interests are spending to defeat Steyer says they believe he’s the real deal when it comes to economic democracy.
  • The whole primary seems like a test designed for a lot of people to fail it: do you judge the candidates by the simple category label each of them fits into, or do you actually plunge into the details of what they’ve done and propose to do? I see a whole lot of the former out there. I’ve tried to supply some of the details on the latter for one candidate.
  • p.s. The California Democratic Socialists of America [CA DSA] voting guide endorses Steyer: “Tom Steyer is somehow running the most progressive campaign. Despite being a billionaire, he supports taxing the rich and supports the Billionaire Tax currently on California’s ballot, which CA DSA has endorsed. He has done an about-face from his previous position to now supporting state-level Medicare for All. He has called ICE a “violent extremist group” and outlined how he, as governor, would prosecute ICE agents. He has also been endorsed by a number of major labor unions, including the California Teachers Association, the California Federation of Teachers, AFSCME 3299, Unite HERE, the California Nurses Association, and the California Labor Federation, as well as progressive groups such as Our Revolution and Courage California, and former gubernatorial candidate Betty Yee. Notably, Steyer is one of two Democrats in the race, alongside Tony Thurmond, to explicitly support California’s law protecting trans girls’ participation in girls’ sports; Becerra, on the other hand, glibly stated that “there’s nothing in the Constitution that says that you are entitled to play a sport”, and other Democrats, including Porter, agreed.”
  • p.s. Media critic Jeff Cohen wrote an essay about Steyer that aligns with my thinking. “He declares: Let me be clear: I generally loathe billionaires and hedge-funders and everyone in the financial speculation elite. I remain skeptical that someone as wealthy as Steyer who operated at the heights of amoral financialized capitalism can deeply understand and fight for working-class interests. If Steyer is elected, will he prove to be the effective “class traitor” that most Californians need him to be—a governor who stands up to corporate greed and power?vSo I was in a quandary. A month ago, after seeing Steyer’s anti-AIPAC video attacking Democratic leaders for failing to “forcefully” oppose Trump’s war, I started an intense dialogue with progressives across California, including journalists, experienced activists, organizational leaders. Almost all—somewhat surprisingly or confusedly or embarrassingly—were arriving at the same conclusion: the billionaire, Tom Steyer, is the best choice for governor.”
    https://www.meditationsinanemergency.com/hey-california-what-does-it-take-to-be-governor/

Xavier Becerra (D) – Voting Rights Attorney

Back to top

RECOMMENDATION: Not our top choice. We feel that he’s always been the “back room guy,” not the leader (no knocks there – we’re backroom peeps too). But there has been some other issues that Becerra’s diehard fans need to take seriously.

  • CHEVRON: He has taken the maximum campaign donation allowable from Chevron for this campaign. It is not a surprise that there are ZERO endorsements from ENVIRONMENTAL groups in our grid below. California Environmental Voters even issued a notice why they didn’t.
  • CAMPAIGN FUNDING SCANDAL: A scandal with two of his underlings diverting campaign funds that will sink us if he’s the only Democratic choice on the ticket against a GOP candidate in November. For you die-hard Becerra fans who think this will just die down if we just ignore it and he keeps saying “Case closed.” – NOT A CHANCE IN HELL!
    • Steve Hilton (R): “You shouldn’t be in this race. You should be preparing your criminal defense.”
    • Katie Porter: “What the quote was, was that you had not been mentioned in the charging documents. But as you know, that does not preclude, because you are also a trained attorney, you know that does not preclude an indictment from being issued against you. We do not know what Dana Williamson said about your involvement, and the government will have the ability to reveal that later.”
    • The GOP is probably already making buttons with him in an orange jumpsuit and Trump’s DOJ is assuredly calculating the best time to spring their own trap on him. Innocence doesn’t matter. They indicted a former FBI Director Jame Comey for spelling out 86 47 with seashells. Does anyone image that they’re not going to flood the zone if Becerra becomes our only Democratic candidate on the ticket?

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWIjf9qKrgY)

Sample endorsements below:

California Young Democrats
dem. party of san fernando
equality CA
SALUD CARBAJAL
Leiu

Speaker
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE NETWORK 
Nayamin Martinez
CO-DIRECTOR, LEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUNTABILITY 
Phoebe Seaton
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, THE LATINO EQUITY, ADVOCACY & POLICY INSTITUTE 
Rey León
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, JUST TRANSITION ALLIANCE 
José T. Bravo
FOUNDING PRESIDENT & CEO, GREENLATINOS 
Mark Magaña
FOUNDER, LATINO OUTDOORS 
José González
international warehouse-socal
Liana
UFCE 770

READING:

Katie Porter – Consumer Protection Advocate

Back to top

RECOMMENDATION: NO, and we say this sadly. We want her back in the House with her “Whiteboards of Death,” eviscerating bank industry CEOs. We want her in the Senate, making other senators sad. But we’re not voting for her now, because she’s not in the top two. Politics is a ferocious world.

Sample of endorsements:

fund herEmily's list
NATIONAL WOMEN'S CAUCUS
California's Women's list
GUN SENSE CANDIDATE
NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTH WORKERS
UAW

Steve Hilton (R) – Former Fox New Host – TRUMP APPROVED! – Small Business Owner

Back to top

RECOMMENDATION: NO, NO, NO! Another problematic Stephen? Tiny twins from different continents? Is there a third continent where we can send them both?

Didn’t anyone ask his former co-workers what he was like?

  • Stephen Hilton
  • Age: 56
  • City of residence: Atherton
  • Occupation: taught at Stanford University, hosted a Fox News show called “The Next Revolution”
  • Education: –
  • Funding:
  • Website: https://stevehiltonforgovernor.com
Donald J. Trump
4 stars! Not good.

He doesn’t talk about very much about the hard-right culture war stuff unless pinned down, but you can see that he did disturbingly well on the Election Forum questionnaire, (posted below) which is all about that stuff. He’s running as a MAGA-GOP in the time of Trump for a reason.

Didn’t anyone think to check with his previous employers? THEY ARE TRYING TO WARN US!

(guardian,com) “Hilton would reportedly pad the halls of Downing Street in socks, ordering civil servants to enact his latest hare-brained scheme, a quirk parodied in the BBC political satire The Thick of It. He also, according to those who worked with him, pushed to scrap maternity leave.

Now he wants to be a politician proper, rather than an aide working behind the scenes. Some are sceptical of how this will work.

The former Liberal Democrat leader Vince Cable, who served in Cameron’s coalition government, was unenthusiastic at the prospect. I think of him as ideologue rather than doer, gadfly not a serious politician,” he said. “His big idea, the ‘big society’, was a disappointment.” Cable believes Hilton can only get elected “by freak accident”.

He would be terrible! said one government adviser who worked in No 10 at the same time as Hilton. “He is someone who was very quickly insanely frustrated with how government works in reality. He comes in with these incredibly wild ideas, wants them all to happen instantly, isn’t interested in compromise, and when it doesn’t happen he throws his toys out the pram.”

His behavior directly inspired the character Stewart Pearson on a BBC political satire “The Thick of It.”

That’s because, under his posh British accent, he’s just another MAGA con artist.

Exhibit 1 – The man described as “terrible” for California is intent on infesting our state with Cal DOGE, his version of a failed and corrupt program that came nowhere near it’s $2 trillion dollar spending target, but still managed to harm millions of people. (Death toll tracker from USAID here)

  • POLLUTION FOR EVERYONE! No surprises here: His solutions include getting rid of regulations, including “stripping [CARB]’s climate policy authority. That’s cool! Dirtier air, water, food, and soil for us, more profit for corporations! Nowhere does his CalDOGE suggest suggest breaking up and municipalizing private-equity monsters like PG&E.
  • HEALTH CARE: How about doing something REALLY HELPFUL – like championing universal health care? Then CA businesses can compete on an equal footing with countries who already have it, and people can become more entrepreneurial without risking their families’ access to health care. Nah, he’s doubling down on a “free-market solution,” like the shit we had to deal with before the Affordable Care Act..
    • RE-ARRANGING THE DECK CHAIRS: NOTHING on health care in his website other than somehow shifting money from eliminating Medi-Cal for undocumented people to poor citizens. No word how he’s going to do that and what hospital emergency wards think of his brainy idea.. Savings would all dissipate into his mandated “free-market” drug/alcohol treatment plans.
    • SHIPPING CA’s DOCTORS OFF TO “DEATH PENALTY” STATES: Also, in case you missed it, he would extradite California telemedicine abortion providers, if an out-of-state jurisdiction (such as Louisiana) issued warrants. Hey Steve, you would be violating California Penal Code § 13778.3, which explicitly shields healthcare providers in California from prosecution, arrest, and extradition for performing or facilitating legally protected reproductive health care, including telemedicine abortion services.
  • CUTTING TAXES FOR THE RICH! He says he wants to eliminate state income tax on the first $100,000 of earnings, and impose a flat 7.5% rate above that. GREAT! Oh, wait! The richest people in California currently pay a 12.30% tax on whatever earning their accountants feel is prudent to declare.

    Let’s check out what this would look like in real life – Hey, this is a surprise!!!!

It looks exactly like the RICH WOULD GET A SUBSTANTIAL TAX CUT!

  • AUSTERITY (PRE-PANDEMIC) BUDGET/SPENDING CUTS TO MATCH THE TAX CUTS FOR RICH PEOPLE. And since we have Prop. 13, he won’t be able to raise property taxes like Texas does. Steve is experienced in creating antidemocratic austerity politicies, which structurally transfer resources from the working majority to the 1 percent of the population that subsists mainly off capital ownership (i.e., stock dividends, rents, and interest). In other words, austerity is not about spending less but about spending in the “correct” way — in favor of the economic and financial elite and to the detriment of the majority of the population.” 
    • LOOK AT THE DAMAGE HE DID IN THE U.K.Given that Hilton wants to realize a version of [his “Big Society”] in America, a question naturally presents itself: What happened when it was implemented in the U.K.? He elides this question, and no wonder, because the Big Society in practice was a vicious mess, demonstrating only the cruelty of its designers and the vacuity of its promise to somehow disentangle an idea of community from economics. The facilities he identifies as the constituent parts of a community—public libraries; neighborhood parks; youth clubs— all need money to function; the Britain he presided over provides an object-lesson in what happens when they‘re deprived of it. Since 2010, over 600 public libraries have been shuttered, along with more than 500 youth centers. Uncountable green spaces have been concreted over and sold off to property developers. Austerity was the only real policy the coalition had: everything else was decorative, and the Big Society was the gaudiest bauble of all, a vast shiny distraction from the brute fact of 110 billion pounds in spending cuts.
  • HE WAS KNOWN FOR OTHER STUPID IDEAS AS WELL:Hilton suggested that one of the United Kingdom’s biggest problems was too much cloudy weather—“Why can’t we fly planes over the eastern Atlantic,” he suggested, “to drop chemicals on the clouds and force them to break up, and get rid of their rain before they get to our shores?”
  • STUPID STATISTIC GAMES: In a state as big as California, where just 5% of the land is developed, there’s plenty of room to build the housing we need. They call it “sprawl.” I call it the California Dream, and I will do everything I can to restore it.
    • Steve’s only been a citizen since 2021. He apparently knows NOTHING about how Californians care about open space, our SOAR initiatives, the already large losses of agriculture and grazing land and our issues with water.
    • Yes. 90% of our population lives on 5% of the land. That sounds crazy, right! But if Steve had done 5 minutes of research, he’d have learned that: more than 27% of CA is agricultural land. Approximately 46% of the state’s land is federal land, which includes mostly national forests, national parks and wildlife areas and military areas. People can’t build homes there. Our state also have this mountain range taking up a huge amount of space, and deserts where there is no access to water. “The only places that are “empty”, and is not tall mountains or impossible deserts of federal forest or park land or productive agricultural land is extremely far away from any infrastructure.” (https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-so-much-empty-space-and-desert-in-California-why-dont-they-just-build-a-bunch-more-houses)
    • We invite Steve to “spread out” from from his current home in Bay-area Atherton, maybe to a place like Modoc County for example. It’s only a five hour commute to Sacramento! It’s been losing people for 30 years and could certainly use your cheerleading!

CLIMATE CHANGE WILL BE A PROBLEM FOR HIM: (abc7) “Hilton is a former Fox News host and a vocal supporter of Trump. He was born in the UK where he served as director of strategy for former Prime Minister David Cameron, and then moved to California in 2012. He became a U.S. citizen in 2021.

Hilton blames climate change policies for the housing and affordability crisis in California, saying the policies have made it more costly to build. He added that he doesn’t believe climate change played a role in last year’s destructive and deadly wildfires.

FAKING IT: (latimes) “He “[Hilton] stopped by the Original Del Taco off 1st Avenue on Saturday after a town hall with lieutenant governor candidate and Barstow native Gloria Romero. His campaign posted a short video on social media of him standing outside the spot — the oldest operating Del Taco — while holding something that looked like a melted Frisbee.

…Hilton gleefully wielded the crunchy mass with one hand as he pointed to the Original Del Taco sign with the other. “My Barstow street taco, I’m going to enjoy,” he concluded in an accent from his native England, while giving a thumbs-up. “See you soon.”

He didn’t take a bite.”

The social media blowback exploded like a digital Montezuma’s revenge...

…But Hilton disappoints again and again. He launched his campaign in Huntington Beach, enamored of politicians there who seek to silo their city from the rest of California and humiliate liberals at every opportunity. His embrace of Trump‘s endorsement and refusal to admit that Joe Biden legitimately won the 2020 presidential election expose him as a toady…

… Instead of offering a bold vision for the future, he offers a return to a past that will never happen again and that wasn’t as great as people make it out to be.

Chad Bianco (R) – Sheriff of Riverside County

Back to top

RECOMMENDATION: NO, NO, NO! Knock-LA refers to him as “Ambulatory Moustache Chad Bianco.” But he’s not amusing at all to those in Riverside who’ve dealt with him. He’s dangerous to democracy and acts as if he’s impervious to all laws.


4 1/2 stars!

Soooo many problematic and unconstitutional possibilities here, and Chad and Steve did VERY WELL on the Election Forum questionnaire. We’ve attached it below, along with the “Family First Pledge” – you can guess what the “right” answers might be.

“I am the antithesis to California state government because I am going to take a nuclear bomb into that building and absolutely destroy everything that they do to us behind closed doors,” he told Eyewitness News during a recent one-on-one interview.” (abc7)

So, who is the man behind the moustache?

  • (LAtimes) “In 2014 he was a member of the Oath Keepers, a far-right, antigovernment group whose members took part in the pro-Trump insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Bianco later said he had discontinued his membership because, like many other law enforcement officers, he felt the organization “did not offer me anything.” But during a nationally televised debate in early May, Bianco said he was “very proud” of his past membership in the group.
  • At a candidate forum in January, Bianco said politicians who support “sanctuary state” policies should be voted out of office. “I wish it was the 1960s, ‘70s, and ‘80s — we’d take them behind the shed and beat the s— out of them,” he said.

He’s an idiot. He took the word of some very sketchy election denialists and took 1500 boxes of ballots to do an unlawful amateur recount. He flouted State Attorney General Rob Bonta’s orders to return the them and the case is currently in front of the state Supreme Court.

(LATimes) Riverside County voters, represented by the UCLA Voting Rights Project, sued Bianco, arguing that the sheriff and Riverside County Registrar of Voters Art Tinoco violated Section 15551 of the California Elections Code, the provision requiring that ballots remain in the custody of election officials. Bonta raised privacy concerns, particularly that vote-by-mail ballots “contain confidential information, particularly voter signatures, and are strictly protected from disclosure by California law.

Let’s ask people from Bianco’s district on how he’s been doing in his current job, when he’s not breaking election codes…

Election Forum questionnaire that Steve and Chad took.

Back to top

Congratulations on your decision to run for office.

For over 20 years, restoringthecaliforniadream.com has conducted California election forums where we make specific candidate recommendations based on a 5-star ratings scale.

Last election cycle we had about 1 million voters following our endorsements.

Besides conducting a dozen live Election Forums webinars giving
endorsements, we will post our endorsements of candidates on our four
websites, emailing and publicizing our recommendations to several hundred
thousand California voters.

In addition, our recommendations are also broadcast on a variety of California radio, TV, and podcast platforms.

In your office we will either say for the candidate:

  • Acceptable…And giving a 3 to 5 star rating plus one candidate will receive “endorsed”
  • Not endorsed…Giving you a 1 to 2-star rating
  • Refused to disclose position…Usually a 1 to 2-star rating

I look forward to hearing from you and hopefully giving you our endorsement.

  1. What is your name?
  2. Why are you running for Governor?
  3. To help California’s economy grow, do you support
    • Raising fees, (If so, which ones?)
    • Closing tax loopholes (If so, which ones?)
    • Raising income taxes (If so on whom?)
    • Raise the sales tax
    • Cutting spending (if so, what areas of the budget and by how much?)
  4. Do you have plans to increase or decrease State regulations? Explain.
  5. What is your view on Parental consent for a minor to get an abortion?
  6. Should California outlaw abortion as some states have? Explain.
  7. Do you support or oppose the Covered California healthcare plan for Californians? Why or why not?
  8. California ranks in the bottom tier of educational excellence in the nation. What do you propose to do with the schools and education policy?
  9. Are we spending the right amount on K-12 Education in this state? Community colleges? The California University System?
  10. What solution do you have for the pension issue in California?
  11. Do you support or oppose transgender bathroom/gym access in schools?
  12. Do you support or oppose:
    • Homeschooling
    • Charter Schools
    • School Choice
  13. Do you support parental notification and school communication on gender confusion of a student?
  14. Do you believe marriage is only between a man and a woman?
  15. Do you favor or oppose a Religious Freedom Act in California?
  16. Do you support or oppose covered California for illegal immigrants?
  17. Do you support or oppose California environmental restrictions on oil and gas drilling and manufacturing?
  18. What would you do to cut waste and fraud in California?
  19. Do you believe in absolute truth? Why or why not? If you believe in absolute truth, what is the source of absolute truth? If you do not believe in absolute truth, how do you determine what is true?

Hey, what is that “Family First Pledge” and who DID sign it?

  • Governor: Ché Ahn, Daniel Mercury, Ryan Tillman
  • Lt. Governor: Ebie Lynch
  • Controller: Herb Morgan
  • Assembly District 46: Tracey Schroeder
  • Superintendent of Public Schools: Sonja Shaw
  • CA GOP Secretary: Laurie Wallace
  • CA GOP Vice Chair: Mahealani “Lani” Lane Urquiza

Because we LOVE “upside-down” world stuff, here is Election Forum‘s own chart comparing “top” candidates.

Back to top