Judges Matter – 2024 Primary Election

Note: This post is “IN PROCESS” and will be periodically updated! (02/17/24)

VOTER GUIDE QUICK LINKS TO: Federal candidates, State candidates, Proposition 1, Judges, County Supervisors, Local Measures

A single judge in Amarillo is upending women’s health care all by himself. It’s never been clearer that every single judge matters. But how does one decide?

  • Listen/Watch for yourself: The League of Women Voters forum for the four contenders for the seat of Judge of the Superior Court, Office #4 is here.

Judge of the Superior Court, Office No. 4 – Vote for (1)

Our goal is to win every contest. Despite there being (4) candidates, we believe this is a horse race between Ted Andrews and Julia Snyder. Therefore, the better choice is Ted.

Edward “Ted” Andrews

Ted has gotten a wide variety of bi-partisan support, which speaks well for him and the efforts he’s made to reach out to the community for feedback. We’d love to get a defense attorney in this seat, but that’s not happening in this election. It’s up to the endorsers to ensure that if he wins, he keeps promises to improve access to justice in this county. Let’s put a pin in our calendars to ask him by the November election to account for what he’s done to make the system more equitable and future benchmarks to look forward to.

GOOD clubJulia Brownley
JACQUI IRWIN
Central Coast Labor CouncilLiuna laborer international

Julia Synder – NO – She is endorsed by the Judge Voter Guide, and that means DO NOT VOTE FOR HER!

Snyder, like Andrews, appears to be a highly competent candidate. However, her rating from Judge Voter Guide tracks very closely with the types of endorsements she’s getting, including one from the Ventura County Republican party. Either she filled out the right-wing group’s toxic questionnaire to their satisfaction for which they’ve awarded her 3 out of 5 possible stars and their endorsement, or that there is something about her that calls to them from the deep.

Partial list:

Mike Malak (D)

Ah, Mike. Not a prosecuter – check! Smart – check! Progressive – check! We’ve spoken with him directly and were impressed with his ideas for improving the court system for more access and equitability. However, we believe that he isn’t prepared for this election, and we definitely don’t want him to bleed votes to put a pick from the “Judge Voter Guide” in this seat.

John McBride

Competent and not a prosecutor – all good. However, his public comments and his endorsement page‘s slant towards police-adjacent issues (trigger word – “public safety”), would make you think that he was a prosecutor, with the one exception of an endorsement from the pastor at the The Lighthouse Church. Maybe he thinks it’s good politics for a non-prosecutor to don the verbal armor of the other team. We would have preferred that he would have expanded on more of what he said in the last paragraph of his “About John” page. Yes, he has a wide knowledge of different kinds of cases, but that’s not enough. He muffed his chance to explain how his experience would be used to make improvements from the current system for those appearing in front of him.


Daniel A. Higson, Attorney & Certified Bankruptcy Specialist, Ventura
Eric McBride, Chief of Police (retired), San Bernardino Police Department, San Bernardino
Mark Larson, Educator (retired), Ventura Unified School District, VenturaTrace Larson, Teacher (retired), Simi Valley Unified School District, Simi ValleyEthan Hudson, Attorney, Camarillo
Samuel W. Howard, Pastor of The Lighthouse Church of Ventura

QUICK LINKS TO: Federal candidates, State candidates, Proposition 1, Judges, County Supervisors, Local Measures

A guide to “Opposite world”

All of these groups are a little behind on filling in Ventura County information, but here is what we have so far from the Judge Voter Guide. Note: more stars is BAD! It means more rightward they perceive the candidate to be.